Statement by H.E. Mr. Kjell Larsson, Minister for the Environment, Eight Session of the Commission of Sustainable Development. High Level Segment with a thematic focus on Preparations for the 2002 Review of progress since UNCED, 26 April 2000

Mr. Chairman,

Can we, sincerely, tell young people today to have confidence in the future? Yes – the programmes, the knowledge and activities around the world promoting sustainable development are indeed impressive as is average economic growth. No – at the same time, serious challenges confront us today, including:

growing gaps between rich and poor

lack of access to clean water

unequal and unsustainable use of energy

increasing health problems caused by environmental degradation

financial instability as a result of globalisation – combined with a lack of political instruments to manage a sustainable global economy

Eight years after the Rio Conference, and 28 years after the Stockholm Conference, Global Environment Outlook 2000 tells us in blunt terms that key trends are still pointing in the wrong direction despite progress that has been made. Yet, in 1997 we all pledged to demonstrate greater measurable progress by the year 2002.

First, we must ensure that the assessment and ten-year review of Agenda 21 at CSD 10 will indeed be transparent, frank and honest. Second, this should be followed by a forward-looking and bold event that will ensure that concrete and tangible steps for the implementation and financing of Agenda 21 will actually be taken. Sustainable development is a question of survival to be accorded even greater importance than traditional security policy. We know what has to be done. It is time to do it.

For this to become a reality, there must be a strong mobilisation of commitment all over the world and at all levels. Several steps need to be taken. Among them, it is now time for the young generation to be actively invited and involved in this undertaking.

Furthermore, Sweden supports the Global Compact initiated by the Secretary-General a year ago, challenging the international business community to implement universal values in the areas of human rights, environment and labour. It is not only in the long-term interest of companies to contribute towards sustainable development, but there is also an increasing realisation that this can yield immediate benefits in terms of market shares and consumer confidence.

An active involvement of civil society and the business sector in the 2002 process and its follow-up is a prerequisite for success. Before then, the United Nations and Member States should initiate a variety of pilot projects and partnership arrangements with the private sector and civil society. The Global Ministerial Environment Forum in Malmö, Sweden, in the end of May will provide an opportunity to explore these issues further.

The national strategies for sustainable development that should be implemented by 2005 will be key components in the preparations for 2002. At the regional level, the European Union will prepare a long-term strategy for sustainable development to be ready for adoption in little more than a year from now.

The proposed World Summit on Sustainable Development should have a strong focus on poverty and the environment, the main challenge facing us together with the threats against the global ecosystems such as climate change. The Summit should advance sustainable consumption and production. The links between environment and security now merit high level political attention. The Summit should also, in my view, recommend concrete measures to ensure global financial stability and increased global equality. In addition, a few urgent sectoral issues such as fresh water, health and energy should be focused upon for concrete action. A gender perspective should permeate all aspects of the preparatory process and the Summit itself.

The experience after Rio demonstrates clearly that the present fragmentation of the global institutional structure for sustainable development does not serve our common interests. There are some bright spots. We applaud the revitalisation of UNEP under Dr. Töpfer´s leadership. However, there is a need for further reform towards a more coherent and effective global institutional structure for sustainable development.

Yes – we can tell young people and ourselves to have confidence in the future, if we now do what we all know has to be done.



Top pagePermanent Mission of Sweden to the United Nations