Agenda
Item 103 & 104: Social development, including questions relating to the
world social situation and to youth, ageing, disabled persons and the family
and the International Year of Older Persons
Statement
by Mr. Asith Bhattacharjee, Counsellor
and
Mr. Bremley W.B. Lyngdoh, Member, Indian Delegation
on
September 28, 2000
_____________________________________________________________________________
Madam
Chairperson,
Allow
me first to congratulate you and the members of the Bureau on your election.
As usual, the introductory statements of Under Secretary General Mr. Nitin
Desai and Director DESA, Mr. John Langmore were as thought provoking, as the
“2000 Report on the World Social Situation”.
We found it extremely useful and would seriously urge the Division to
examine whether it could not be issued more frequently; say, once in two
years.
Trends
in the 2000 Report are disconcerting. Though
the rate of growth of the world population
slowed down, its distribution changed with more people, about 80%,
living in developing countries. Whereas, in the sixties,
22% of the population of developing countries lived in urban areas,
this figure almost doubled to
40%. In the last 40 years, the number of cities with a population of over a
million increased three-fold; from 112 to 372. Urbanisation and its attendant
social consequences are an issue that developing nations have to reckon with.
The
nineties saw a sharp setback for developing economies with near stagnation of
their per capita incomes. This,
as a fraction of that of the developed countries, fell from over 20% in the
beginning of the last decade to below 20%.
The rich became richer and the poor consigned to inexorable poverty in
unacceptably increasing numbers. The 2000 report is chilling. The incidence of
child poverty increased rapidly in developing countries and the situation is
critical. Though poverty in old age has been combated in developing countries
through state assured pension schemes, newer problems like alienation are
increasingly on the rise. Their informal economy is increasing and a global
workforce of a billion, almost one third of the world’s workforce, is
under-employed and consigned to this sector. Wage disparities
“dramatically” increased in the past decade.
Developing countries are faced with the double burden of
older diseases not being fully eradicated while acquiring those that
traditionally were major causes of death in developed countries. Violence
against women, prostitution and violence against children have all risen.
Organised crime has grown to “monumental” proportions.
Globalisation
contributed in no small measure to the world social situation. Breaking down the protective role of the state with arguments of an
“efficiency” driven market engine, have had extremely negative impact on
distributive justice. The
social implications of this fall-out are writ large on the faces of the
world’s 1.2 billion poor.
No
wonder, then the 2000 Report warns of a “clear danger” of the repetition
of the experience of
globalisation and liberalisation of the early 20th century with a
few enclaves of “modern” or “progressive” countries commanding global
heights with the majority left to drift outside the mainstream of integration.
With
these comments, I yield the floor to our youth delegate, Mr. Bremley Lyngdoh.
Madam Chairperson,
As
the first Indian youth representative to be included in India’s delegation
to the United Nations General Assembly, it is a great honour to address this
committee on the theme of involving youth as active partners in decision
making towards the creation of sustainable livelihoods.
A
livelihood comprises the capabilities, assets and activities required for a
means of living. It is sustainable when it can cope with and recover from
stresses and shocks and still maintain or enhance its capabilities and assets
both now and in the future, while not undermining the natural resource base.
The
creation of sustainable livelihoods has become an important factor in
sustainable development, particularly in developing countries and among
disadvantaged populations. More support should be given to the promotion and
development of economical and environmental sustainable youth livelihoods.
Sustainable development requires an explicit consideration of future
generations. Youth will inherit many of the environmental, economic and social
problems created over the past decades and incorporating their opinions and
concerns into policies at all levels is critical to sustainable development.
The capacity of young people to address sustainability issues and become
leaders in the 21st century is also critical.
.
Addressing
the concerns of young people worldwide is critical to the success of
sustainable development programmes because they are the current and future
leaders of our communities. Encouraging civic involvement and investing in
youth’s key concerns must be an urgent priority of Governments and Civil
Society. Recent major international conferences have addressed issues
surrounding youth livelihoods development. However the resolutions that
emerged from these conferences have, in some areas, failed to be sufficiently
acted upon. Therefore it is up to us the youth, to take actions consistent
with the commitment made by Governments in these world conference. To that
end, there is a move for a great public gathering and conversation in the fall
of 2002 called the Youth Employment Summit, with a goal of launching a Decade
Campaign of Action so that 500 million young adults, especially youth facing
poverty, will have productive and sustainable livelihoods by the year 2012.
While
youth in developing countries (particularly young women) will have improved
access to more relevant education and training to develop their improved skill
sets and self-motivation required to generate and sustain viable livelihoods,
much more needs to be done. With better policy and programming congruence
among education, training and credit provision, youth with enhanced skill
sets, will be better equipped to access credit, develop and sustain
self-employment initiatives. More effective and relevant education and
training will result in more productive employment in micro and small
businesses, particularly in the informal sector, larger enterprises that seek
enterprising self-motivated employees, and government and civil society that
seek enterprising employees. The improved skills and self-motivation of the
emerging generation will contribute to increased social and economic
productivity of communities. Improved skills will also be conducive to fewer
social and political problems that are based on youth unemployment and lack of
initiative. Overall, improved skills will contribute to enhanced employment
opportunities and the practical generation of sustainable livelihoods for
young women and men.
Our
Hon’ble Prime Minister, Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee in his Independence Day
address said, “India has now become a Young Nation.” Youth in the age of
15-35 years constitute approximately 34% of the total population in our country.
According to the 1991 census, the total population is roughly 271 million.
However, the changing
socio-economic scenario, a need was felt for a new comprehensive National Youth
Policy. Action has been initiated, by the Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sport
to formulate a revised Youth Policy taking into account the needs and
aspirations of the youth. To channelise the immense energies of youth into
constructive work, this ministry is implementing several programmes to inculcate
the values of secularism and national integration, training and upgradation of
skills to open up economic opportunities to them, and to develop leadership
qualities. With regard to the International Year of Volunteers in 2001, India
has shown its commitment as a leader in volunteerism where millions of its young
people are mobilised to serve as volunteers in various social, economic and
environmental projects and programmes.
Livelihood
is a broader category than employment and more in line with the actual manner in
which many young people in developing countries organize themselves and their
activities in order to survive. Adaptability and dynamic livelihood capabilities
are the key to generating sustainable livelihoods. Dynamic livelihood
capabilities can be thought of as enterprising behaviour in a developing
context. The institutional challenge is to improve the effectiveness of the
non-formal training system in order to mediate the latent potential of young
people into productive social and economic activity, while understanding their
current livelihood conditions and capabilities. Governments need to address key
global policies that affect youth employment and livelihood. They need to take
strategies that promote self-employment and entrepreneurship, school to work
programmes and work-based training. Partnerships with the private sector needs
to be strengthened and the use of new information and communication technologies
to support youth employment and training must be encouraged. The youth
themselves must be empowered to generate the solutions to youth employment and
their best practices and success stories must be acknowledged at all levels to
support further replication of such initiatives
from the grassroots to the global level.
Madam Chairperson,
Young
people bring entrepreneurship, dedication and a sense of possibility to
international policy planning. Youth organizations must maintain sustained
international pressure to help forge a coherent follow-up to the UN world
conference commitments. This is the challenge that lies ahead. Young people have
contributed to each “Plan of Action or Platform for Action” adopted by the
UN conferences. They have joined forces with the broader Civil Society after
all, issues that affect humanity also affect youth.
President
John F. Kennedy said, “The future promise of any nation can be directly
measured by the present prospects of its youth.”
Let us show a true partnership with youth in the international community.
The youth are the leaders of tomorrow but they are your partners for today.